Wednesday, August 04, 2010

Prop 8 update

"Although Proposition 8 fails to possess even a rational basis, the evidence presented at trial shows that gays and lesbians are the type of minority strict scrutiny was designed to protect," Walker ruled.

"Plaintiffs do not seek recognition of a new right. To characterize plaintiffs' objective as "the right to same-sex marriage" would suggest that plaintiffs seek something different from what opposite-sex couples across the state enjoy -- namely, marriage. Rather, plaintiffs ask California to recognize their relationships for what they are: marriages."

"Proposition 8 places the force of law behind stigmas against gays and lesbians, including: gays and lesbians do not have intimate relationships similar to heterosexual couples; gays and lesbians are not as good as heterosexuals; and gay and lesbian relationships do not deserve the full recognition of society."

Prop 8 overturned!!!!!!!!!!

Prop 8 has been overturned today. Next step in history to come.

This blogs gets such little activity

I really need to get back over here and share my larger public thoughts again. I have been writing in a personal, private space which has been very important to me and very fulfilling, but I also like to get in a good rant at the world in general. Hopefully I'll find time to visit here again more regularly.

Wednesday, June 17, 2009

So i just updated the software on my iphone and the wide keyboard option is the best thing!! So happy to have some space :)
So, Obama has extended benefits to same sex partners and domestic partners of federal employees. And everyone keeps trying to tell us that domestic partnership gives us the same rights as marriage... So what's in a word? Evidently full medical coverage for one since it isn't included for ss/dp but must be for married couples otherwise why list it as an exception. Oh, and of course it also does not apply to the military. Not even civilian employees of the military? I wonder...

Monday, June 15, 2009

Testing the mobile blogging option out...

Wednesday, November 05, 2008

One Big Obama step forward, Two smaller steps backwards

Well we've done it. We broke the race barrier and have a new leader that I think can get us going again. But the victory is bitter sweet for me, because while we have a true leader taking over the White House, I find myself feeling like a stranger in my own "house" of California. We have voted to write discrimination into our constitution and not only does this affect me personally right now, but the opportunity it opens to now deny rights to others is what the real sadness is. A shortsighted majority of homophobic voters has opened a door to all kinds of exclusions of rights now. I truly hope the courts can step in and fix it.

Then in addition to our own state drama, a friend has informed me that her state of Arkansas has taken away the right to adopt or be a foster parent unless you are a "married couple" which not only discriminates against non-traditional couples it also affects single people that would otherwise make wonderful supporting families in favor of a fairytale that all too often doesn't exist.

So, America has shown that while we can rise above racial prejudice for the sake of our country we still have a lot of work to do. There is still a lot of bias and injustice to be fixed. There is still a lot of prejudice and wrong thinking out there. There is still a lot of fear of those different, and a feeling of ones security or norm being threatened by "outsiders". I have to say, and I've heard it said before, there are a lot of people hiding behind a cloak of Christianity that don't ever seem to look deeper into the teaching of Christ... so here it is again, from more sources than I can list here:

The New Dictionary of Cultural Literacy, Third Edition. 2002.

Let him who is without sin cast the first stone

According to the Gospel of John, the Pharisees, in an attempt to discredit Jesus, brought a woman charged with adultery before him. Then they reminded Jesus that adultery was punishable by stoning under Mosaic law and challenged him to judge the woman so that they might then accuse him of disobeying the law. Jesus thought for a moment and then replied,
“He that is without sin among you, let him cast the first stone at her.”
The people crowded around him were so touched by their own consciences that they departed. When Jesus found himself alone with the woman, he asked her who were her accusers.
She replied, “No man, lord.”
Jesus then said, “Neither do I condemn thee: go and sin no more.”

I think this older post from 2006 also makes an important point:

The proper order of things...

Monday, October 20, 2008

Puppy Love short comedy

This is too accurate - at least when it comes to some of the best kept secrets among Boston Terrier owners. There are things they don't tell you until you "join the club" so to speak.

And just to answer the characters question, if she were a lesbian the dog would be a prerequisite not a hinderance. Go ahead, you know you want to watch it now!


Tuesday, January 29, 2008

Gone but not forgotten

I have been SOOOOO busy I have not been back here in a while. But then when I went to chck on it, it was still here. So I figured I should revisit this and start adding some tidbits every now and again. Nothing right this minute mind you, but soon.

Tuesday, February 06, 2007

Positive Press for Pit Bulls

I was sent this link to a video on youtube.com of a news report on pits. It is the first positive report I have seen the media do. We need more unbiased reports on pit bull/dog related news items. This one is a very good start. There are other videos related to pits on the page and they are much more emotional. I liked them too, but be aware that they are much more heart felt and heart breaking.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mGairk18L8g

Sunday, December 03, 2006

Pro sports and government

Well, I got on my soap box today and sent the following email letter to my state politicians. I figured I'd just post it here as well. If I get a worthwhile response I'll let you know...

To Whom It May Concern-

I have heard news reports in the last few days that Either Senator Feinstein or State Senator Migden would be proposing legislation regarding the SF 49ers potential move from SF to another Bay Area location, and imposing restrictions, etc. on such dealings. I am writing to convey my total disgust over the amount of effort being expended by state government regarding this issue. I am not a huge sports fan but I do understand the impact a move would have on local economies. Still, the team is a private business with as much right to seek a better deal as any other business. Unless and until the City and County of SF wants to buy the team outright, the best they can do is try to negotiate the better deal. The fact that I live in Santa Clara county is also not a factor, as I would be equally upset with the State involvement if they were speaking with L.A., CA or N.Y., NY. Evidently that would not be an issue though. The only issue is a local move - which would at least keep the revenue semi-local and keep the team near it's original fan base. Kind of splitting hairs even more on the issue that shouldn't be a government issue to begin with, isn't it.

It is not, in my opinion, the place of our state elected officials to try to legislate where private business can relocate. I am very disappointed that with serious state and federal issues out there I am hearing about this so much. I think your close ties to the bay area, and your sense of responsibility to SF, is clouding your view of the bigger picture. As a lifelong California resident, I am ashamed of the shift in priorities that seem to have taken place in the minds and actions of our elected officials. I come from a time when California was the top in education, transportation, and standard of living. I grew up passionate about and proud of our state. Now, as I drive along pot holed roads, looking at vacant buildings and seeing youth struggling for a quality and competitive education I am reading about legislation to block a neighboring county from making a competing bid for a sports team. Shame on you. As I hear about members of our National Guard deployed in Iraq not getting their paychecks, their families trying to make ends meet, their credit getting trashed. Shame on you. As I myself pay higher energy bills, higher fuel prices, higher taxes, more for higher education fees, see state parks closed for budget reasons, county services at a bare minimum - such as animal control, city parks closed for contamination with no proposed reopening. Shame on you. As I see the ultra conservative right still dictating what we can and can't do with our bodies and minds. Steam rolling over the rights of the majority of moderates (on both sides of the isle) as gay bashing again increases, Roe v. Wade is precariously perched, normal citizens are profiled and labeled based on where they sit on the plane or how they pay for a ticket, illegal immigrants (not those here legally) are in the mean time trying to get the right to VOTE - in our elections on issues that affect the CITIZENS of these cities and counties of the state of California. And this is, by the way, a slap in the face for all those that went through the hard work of gaining their citizenship legally - of which my friends number many. Shame on you.

I urge you to get back to the business of bringing back what California once was, and stop wasting tax payers money on private business issues. Once the city, county or state owns a team, then they can waste our tax dollars fighting about where they can cannot locate. In the mean time, please focus you attention and our resources on what needs to be fixed within the state of California.

Wednesday, October 25, 2006

Skidboot the Dog

A heart-warming segment from Texas Country Reporter, with Bob Phillips.
For more information visit www.TexasCountryReporter.com or www.skidboot.com

Tuesday, September 12, 2006

rode the motorcycle to work

Well, today was a big day for me so far. I bought a kawasaki ninja 250 a month or so ago and today was the first day I rode it to work and went over 40mph. I have been practicing in the neighborhood so it's all 25-35mph. I took the MC safety course and it was great, but again, you only get up to about 35mph tops. I took it to my girlfriends softball practice once and got up to 40mph but that was it. Today, when I finally got on the expressway, I got up to 65mph. But the speed limit is 45-50 depending on the area so I quickly took it down to that. And I had to go through town for a bit before I got the feel for it all and then crossed over to the expressway. Since I'm still green I worry about my reaction times so I want to make sure I don't jump in to anything too soon. It may be over cautious, but even though I am a very observant driver I don't want to have my ability to handle the bike be behind my ability to see a problem. So, just taking it slow. But the whole reason I bought it was to save on gas so it is important to get in there and start riding it for the bog stuff.

Wednesday, July 19, 2006

embryo=life but human=collateral?

isn't it interesting how when it is just a mass of cells multiplying it is morally reprehensible to use it to save countless thousands of people - referred to by Bush himself as murder; yet when it becomes a fully functioning human being it is perfectly ok to send them off to war to die, or drop bombs on them as civilians and they are then referred to as collateral damage. How exactld oes that make sense again? Cells have more basic human rights than...humans?

Friday, May 26, 2006

moving up to big kid school

Well, I am finally done with my return to community college and get to return to San Jose State. It's a long trip going part time. The next "2 years" will take me more like 4. But it will all be worth it! In the fall I will be a Behavioral Sciences/Psychology double major. I can't find the words to express how excited I am about this. I joined the American Psychological Association as a student affiliate. I will be able to tap in to vast resources on Comparative Psychology in my pursuit of harmony between human and dog. Real harmony, not the "do as I say" harmony most people think of when they think of dogs and people. I mean the kind where we get to UNDERSTAND the dogs in our lives and appreciate how they are different from us and how better to communicate. Can't wait.

Monday, March 20, 2006

The proper order of things:

On Wednesday, March 1, 2006, in Annapolis, at a hearing on the proposed Constitutional Amendment to prohibit gay marriage, Jamie Raskin, professor of law at American University, testified as requested.

At the end of his testimony, Republican Senator Nancy Jacobs said: "Mr. Raskin, my Bible says marriage is only between a man and a woman. What do you have to say about that?"

Raskin replied: "Senator, when you took your oath of office, you placed your hand on the Bible and swore to uphold the Constitution. You did not place your hand on the Constitution and swear to uphold the Bible."

The room erupted with applause.

Friday, March 17, 2006

Interesting Personality Test

Well, as is usually the case, my friend Julie posted an online test on her blog and I had to run off and try it.

I actually really enjoyed the test, all 10 pages of it. This is the little color bar of my results:



There are definitely some aspects of this that were right on. It helps to read the Glossary of Traits so you are on the same page as the test when interpreting the graph. It's easy to fall back on preconceived definitions. In particular here is the definition for the Trait Authoritarianism - Your adherence to the social order and how much you favor obedience. This is not the same as an Authoritarianism in the political sense: describes a form of government characterized by strict obedience to the authority of the state, which often maintains and enforces social control through the use of oppressive measures.

You can read the full breakdown here.

And if you're interested, you can take the test yourself here.

Wednesday, February 22, 2006

My friends Waffle House news!

My friend Julie posted Waffle House news on her blog and it reminded me of the one time I had been to a Waffle House. I commented on her blog, and she reminded me I should write about it on MY blog. Hah, someday I'll get the hang of all of this...

So, Julie, myself and a third friend were back in Atlanta many moons ago on a kind of business trip. There isn't much I remember about the trip, besides standing right next to Amy Ray, or seeing Michelle Malone for the first time. But I remember the Waffle House. Julie was the only Waffle House veteran out of the 3 of us and I think even she was caught off guard. The first thing that should have been a clue was when the waitress asked if we wanted separate checks - Oh No we said. Being from California we knew better than to ask for those! So we placed our order and had a rather enjoyable meal - minus the people smoking at their tables which was also alien to us.

When we went up to pay the check things kind of fell apart. It was under $20 for all three of us. We were really impressed. Good enough food, low cost. But things got dicey when the cash register couldn't go past $9.99. They were having a hell of a time ringing up that one big check with three people on it. Who knew we would be throwing them such a curve ball by NOT getting our own checks!

So the article mentions how WH is now taking credit cards...and I have to wonder how that's going to go.

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Bad Dog Wins Westminster

Just a quick note, late, to say that the winner of this years Westminster Kennel Club Dog Show was none other than the "breed" banned in cities within 27 states of these United states - Rufus, the Bull Terrier. Go Rufus, you handsome dog you! His owner said there are cities they simply avoid so as not to land in jail. How sad is that when a good dog is banned for what he is, not who he is - sound familiar!? There's a nice story about it at happynews.

Wednesday, February 01, 2006

Really good article on Breed Bans

I can't possibly even try to paraphrase what the New Yorker said in this article on dog breed bans. This is a long, but VERY accurate and logical article about the flaws of breed ban laws and where the real issues lie.